PRO SCIENTIA RURALIS

PRO AGRICULTURA HARGITAE UNIVERSITAS ALAPÍTVÁNY

SZAKIRODALMI SZEMPONTOK A TÁRSADALMI BEÁGYAZÓDÁS ELEMZÉSÉHEZ
LITERATURE ON THE ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL EMBEDDEDNESS

SÁROSI-BLÁGA ÁGNES
KAM-Regionális és Antropológiai Kutatások Központja, Csíkszereda
agnesblaga@gmail.com

2020. (V. évfolyam) 1-4. lapszám. 156-174.

PDF
borito-20

Absztrakt

Jelen tanulmányban egy 2011 óta zajló, székelyföldi agrárinnovációs folyamatok elemzésével foglalkozó kutatási programhoz kapcsolódóan olyan szakirodalmi anyagok ismertetésére kerül sor, amelyek vidéki térségek agrárvállalkozásai esetében a társadalmi beágyazódás konkrét formáinak kutatását és bemutatását tartalmazzák és ilyen értelemben modellértékük van a székelyföldi térség számára.

Kulcsszavak: társadalmi beágyazódás, új vidékfejlesztési paradigma, agrárinnováció, Székelyföld

Abstract

In the present paper, in connection with a research programme on the analysis of agricultural innovation processes in Szeklerland, which has been ongoing since 2011, literature is presented that contains research and presentation of specific forms of social embeddedness in agricultural enterprises in rural areas and, in this sense, has model value for the Szeklerland region.

Keywords: social embeddedness, new rural development paradigm, agricultural innovation, Szeklerland

Szakirodalom

  1. Akgum, A. A. – Baycan, T. – Nijkamp, P. (2013): The Engine of Sustainable Rural Development: Embeddedness of Entrepreneurs in Rural Turkey. In Gazi University Journal of Science 26(1):119-127.
  2. Biró A. Zoltán – Magyar Ferenc (2017): A generációváltás esélyei. Agrárvállalkozók innovatív szerepe a székelyföldi térségben. Státus, Csíkszereda.
  3. Bosworth, G. – Willett, J. (2011): Embeddedness or Escapism? Rural Perceptions and Economic Development in Cornwall and Northumberland. In: Sociologia Ruralis, 51/2.
  4. Cush, P. – Macken-Walsh, Á. (2016): The potential for joint farming ventures in Irish agriculture: a sociological review. In European Countryside, 1: 33-48. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0003
  5. Dudek, M. (2016): Economic activity in agriculture in the perspective of embeddednes theory: the case of Poland. In Economics of Agriculture 1.
  6. Favilli, E. – Dvortsin, L. – Brunori, G. (2016): How to implement effective and efficient agricultural innovation support systems? Some insights from an European cross – country analysis. Conference paper, 12th European IFSASymposium.
  7. Fischer, H. – Burton, R.J.F. (2014): Understanding Farm Succession as Socially Constructed Endogenous Cycles. In: Sociologia Ruralis, 54/4. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12055
  8. Floysand, A. – Sjoholt, P. (2007): Rural Development and Embeddedness: The Importance of Human Relations for Industrial Restructuring in Rural Areas. In: Sociologia Ruralis, 47/3.
  9. Gezelius, S. S. (2014): Exchange and Social Structure in Norwegian Agricultural Communities: How Farmers Acquire Labour and Capital. Sociologia Ruralis, Vol 54, Number 2.
  10. Granovetter, M. (1985): Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. In The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3 (Nov., 1985): 481-510.
  11. Hinrics, C.C. (2000): Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market. In: Journal of Rural Studies, 16. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00063-7
  12. Jack, S.L. – Anderson, S.L. (2002): ‘The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process’, Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 476–87. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3
  13. Lombardi, A. – Migliore, G. – Verneau, F. – Schifani, G. – Cembalo, L. (2015): Are „good guys” more likely to participate in local agriculture? In Food Quality and Preference 45 (2015) 158–165.
  14. Mckeever, E. – Anderson, A. R. – Jack, S. (2014): Social embeddedness in entrepreneurship research: The importance of context and community. In Elizabeth Chell és Mine Karataş-Özkan (szerk.) Handbook of Research on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  15. Moragues-Faus, A.M. – Sonnino, R. (2012): Embedding Quality in the Agro-food System: The Dynamics and Implications of Place-Making Strategies in the Olive Oil Sector of Alto Palancia, Spain. In: Sociologia Ruralis, 52/2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00558.x
  16. Neumeier, S. (2012) Why do Social Innovations in Rural Development Matter and Should They be Considered More Seriously in Rural Development Research? – Proposal for a Stronger Focus on Social Innovations in Rural Development Research. In Sociologia Ruralis, Vol 52, Number 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x
  17. Polanyi, K. (2001[1944]): The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time, with a foreword from Joseph Stiglitz and introduction from Fred Block, Boston MA, Beacon Press.
  18. Schifani, G. – Migliore, G. – Hashem, S. – Pietro, R. (2016): Identifying Social Entrepreneurial Behaviour in Farmers participation in Alternative Food Network. In Rivista di Economia Agraria, 2016/1.
  19. Uzzi, B. (1997): ‘Social structure and competition: the paradox of embeddedness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67.
  20. Young, N. (2010): Business Networks, Collaboration and Embeddedness in Local and Extra-local Spaces: The Case of Port Hardy, Canada. In: Sociologia Ruralis, 50/4.
  21. Zukin, S. and DiMaggio, P. (1990): ‘Introduction’, in S. Zukin and P. DiMaggio, (Eds), Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 1–36.